Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39729081›Full record

ArticleNCHS data brief2024

Daily Screen Time Among Teenagers: United States, July 2021-December 2023.

Benjamin Zablotsky, Basilica Arockiaraj, Gelila Haile, Amanda E Ng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NCHS data brief, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Benjamin Zablotsky
Basilica Arockiaraj
Gelila Haile
Amanda E Ng

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This report describes the self-reported prevalence of daily screen time among teenagers ages 12-17 years and explores whether differences exist by selected characteristics and demographics. Methods: Data from the July 2021-December 2023 National Health Interview Survey-Teen were used for this analysis. Point estimates and the corresponding confidence intervals were calculated using SAS-callable SUDAAN software to account for the complex sample design of NHIS-Teen. Differences between percentages were evaluated using two-sided significance tests at the 0.05 level. Key findings: During July 2021-December 2023, about one-half of teenagers had 4 hours or more of daily screen time (50.4%). Black non-Hispanic teenagers (60.4%) were most likely to have 4 hours or more of daily screen time compared with teenagers in other race and Hispanic origin groups. About 1 in 4 teenagers with 4 hours or more of daily screen time have experienced anxiety (27.1%) or depression symptoms (25.9%) in the past 2 weeks.

Indexed as

Screen TimeAdolescentAnxietyChildDepressionFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39729081
PMCPMC11701796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.