Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39728967›Full record

ReviewVeterinary sciences2024

The Evolution and Role of Molecular Tools in Measuring Diversity and Genomic Selection in Livestock Populations (Traditional and Up-to-Date Insights): A Comprehensive Exploration.

Hosameldeen Mohamed Husien, Ahmed A Saleh, Nada N A M Hassanine, Amr M A Rashad, Mahmoud A Sharaby, Asmaa Z Mohamed, Heba Abdelhalim, Elsayed E Hafez, Mohamed Osman Abdalrahem Essa, Saber Y Adam and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Veterinary sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Current Applications and Future Prospects of High-ThroughputAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genomic Characterization, Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles, andAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Hosameldeen Mohamed HusienLaboratory of Metabolic Manipulation of Herbivorous Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.ORCID 0009-0008-8993-3507
Ahmed A SalehCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1314-8066
Nada N A M HassanineCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Amr M A RashadAnimal and Fish Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture (Al-Shatby), Alexandria University, Alexandria 11865, Egypt.
Mahmoud A SharabyAnimal and Fish Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture (Al-Shatby), Alexandria University, Alexandria 11865, Egypt.
Asmaa Z MohamedAnimal and Fish Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture (Saba Basha), Alexandria University, Alexandria 21531, Egypt.
Heba AbdelhalimAnimal Production Research Institute, Agriculture Research Centre, Giza 12126, Egypt.
Elsayed E HafezArid Lands Cultivation Research Institute, City of Scientific Research and Technological Applications, New Borg El Arab, Alexandria 21934, Egypt.
Mohamed Osman Abdalrahem EssaCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Albutana University, Rufaa 22217, Sudan.
Saber Y AdamCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Ning ChenState Key-Laboratory of Sheep Genetic Improvement and Healthy-Production, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Reclamation Sciences, Shihezi 832000, China.
Mengzhi WangLaboratory of Metabolic Manipulation of Herbivorous Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program under the 14th Five-Year Plan (2023YFD1301705), the Ministry of Science and Technology of China's High-End Foreign Experts Program (G2023014066L), and the Bintuan Agricultural Innov (2023YFD1301705), (G2023014066L), (2023AB078, 2024AB033).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distinctive molecular approaches and tools, particularly high-throughput SNP genotyping, have been applied to determine and discover SNPs, potential genes of interest, indicators of evolutionary selection, genetic abnormalities, molecular indicators, and loci associated with quantitative traits (QTLs) in various livestock species. These methods have also been used to obtain whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data, enabling the implementation of genomic selection. Genomic selection allows for selection decisions based on genomic-estimated breeding values (GEBV). The estimation of GEBV relies on the calculation of SNP effects using prediction equations derived from a subset of individuals in the reference population who possess both SNP genotypes and phenotypes for target traits. Compared to traditional methods, modern genomic selection methods offer advantages for sex-limited traits, low heritability traits, late-measured traits, and the potential to increase genetic gain by reducing generation intervals. The current availability of high-density genotyping and next-generation sequencing data allow for genome-wide scans for selection. This investigation provides an overview of the essential role of advanced molecular tools in studying genetic diversity and implementing genomic selection. It also highlights the significance of adaptive selection in light of new high-throughput genomic technologies and the establishment of selective comparisons between different genomes. Moreover, this investigation presents candidate genes and QTLs associated with various traits in different livestock species, such as body conformation, meat production and quality, carcass characteristics and composition, milk yield and composition, fertility, fiber production and characteristics, and disease resistance.

Indexed as

genomic selectionGWASmolecular toolsNGSQTLssignatures of selectionSNP chip

Identifiers

PMID39728967
PMCPMC11680231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.