ReviewSports (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Subregions of the Rotator Cuff Muscles Present Distinct Anatomy, Biomechanics, and Function.
Review in Sports (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the quality and reliability of rotator cuff injury related videos on Bilibili and TikTok: A cross-sectional analysis.Medicine · 2026Article
- Quantifying dynamic muscle lengths and moment arms of musculoskeletal joints using FEBio studio: A demonstration in the glenohumeral joint.Journal of biomechanics · 2026Article
- Progressive Rotator Cuff Tears Alter Strain Across Footprint and Tear Borders: Subregion-Specific Loading Reveals Size-Dependent Mechanical Risk Zones.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Shoulder and elbow injuries are prevalent among baseball players, particularly pitchers, who experience repetitive eccentric loading of the shoulder, leading to muscle damage and increased injury risk. Nearly 40% of shoulder injuries in baseball occur in pitchers, with many facing low rates of return to sport. The rotator cuff (RC) muscles-supraspinatus (SSP), infraspinatus (ISP), subscapularis (SSC), and teres minor (TMin)-are crucial for shoulder stability, movement, and force generation, particularly in overhead sports. Each RC muscle comprises subregions with distinct biomechanical properties, such as strength, moment arm behavior, and activation patterns. These differences allow for a finely tuned balance between joint stability and mobility. For example, the superior subregion of the ISP significantly contributes to external rotation, a function critical in sports like baseball that require precision and power. During pitching, the SSP, ISP, and SSC stabilize the glenohumeral joint through high activation during explosive phases, such as stride, arm cocking, and arm acceleration. Understanding these functional subregional differences is vital for diagnosing and managing shoulder pathologies like RC tears. Despite advancements, clinicians face challenges in predicting re-injury risks and determining return-to-play readiness for athletes with shoulder injuries. Integrating insights into subregional biomechanics with patient care could enhance outcomes. Tailored interventions-whether surgical or rehabilitative-targeting specific subregions could improve recovery times, reduce re-injury risks, and enable more personalized treatment plans. Such approaches are especially beneficial for athletes, older individuals, and those prone to RC injuries, promoting better long-term shoulder health and performance. The present work aims to highlight some of the research on these subregions and their differences, providing insights to enhance treatment approaches for shoulder injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.