Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39728874›Full record

ArticleSports (Basel, Switzerland)2024

A Comparison of Three Protocols for Determining Barbell Bench Press Single Repetition Maximum, Barbell Kinetics, and Subsequent Measures of Muscular Performance in Resistance-Trained Adults.

Matthew T Stratton, Austin T Massengale, Riley A Clark, Kaitlyn Evenson-McMurtry, Morgan Wormely

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sports (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthew T StrattonBasic and Applied Laboratory for Dietary Interventions in Exercise and Sport, Department of Health, Kinesiology, and Sport, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3877-092X
Austin T MassengaleBasic and Applied Laboratory for Dietary Interventions in Exercise and Sport, Department of Health, Kinesiology, and Sport, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688, USA.
Riley A ClarkBasic and Applied Laboratory for Dietary Interventions in Exercise and Sport, Department of Health, Kinesiology, and Sport, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688, USA.
Kaitlyn Evenson-McMurtryBasic and Applied Laboratory for Dietary Interventions in Exercise and Sport, Department of Health, Kinesiology, and Sport, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688, USA.
Morgan WormelyBasic and Applied Laboratory for Dietary Interventions in Exercise and Sport, Department of Health, Kinesiology, and Sport, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne repetition maximum (1RM) is a vital metric for exercise professionals, but various testing protocols exist, and their impacts on the resulting 1RM, barbell kinetics, and subsequent muscular performance testing are not well understood. This study aimed to compare two previously established protocols and a novel self-led method for determining bench press 1RM, 1RM barbell kinetics, and subsequent muscular performance measures.

methodsTwenty-four resistance-trained males (n = 12, 24 ± 6.1 years) and females (n = 12, 22.5 ± 5.5 years) completed three laboratory visits in a randomized crossover fashion. During each visit, a 1RM was established using one of the three protocols followed by a single set to volitional fatigue using 80% of their 1RM. A Sex:Protocol repeated measures ANOVA was used to determine the effects of sex and differences between protocols.

resultsNo significant differences were observed between the protocols for any measure, except for 1RM peak power (

conclusionsThese data suggest the protocol used to establish 1RM may have minimal impact on the final 1RM, 1RM barbell kinetics, and subsequent muscular endurance in a laboratory setting.

Indexed as

average concentric velocitymaximal strength assessmentrate of perceived exertionresistance trainingvelocity-based training

Identifiers

PMID39728874
PMCPMC11679921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.