Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39728838›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine and infectious disease2024

Epidemiology of Lymphatic Filariasis Antigen and Microfilaria in Samoa, 2019: 7-9 Months Post Triple-Drug Mass Administration.

Helen J Mayfield, Harriet Lawford, Benn Sartorius, Patricia M Graves, Sarah Sheridan, Therese Kearns, Shannon M Hedtke, Katherine Gass, Take Naseri, Robert Thomsen and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine and infectious disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Progression of lymphatic filariasis antigenaemia and microfilaraemia over 4.5 years in antigen-positive individuals, Samoa 2019-2023.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2025
    Article
  4. Recurrence of microfilaraemia after triple-drug therapy for lymphatic filariasis in Samoa: Recrudescence or reinfection?International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Helen J MayfieldCentre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3462-4324
Harriet LawfordCentre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia.
Benn SartoriusCentre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia.
Patricia M GravesCollege of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD 4878, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5215-3901
Sarah SheridanSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2033, Australia.
Therese KearnsMenzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, NT 0810, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0862-7572
Shannon M HedtkeDepartment of Environment and Genetics, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7499-7662
Katherine GassNeglected Tropical Diseases Support Centre, The Task Force for Global Heath, Decatur, GA 30030, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2084-8039
Take NaseriMinistry of Health, Apia, Samoa.
Robert ThomsenMinistry of Health, Apia, Samoa.
Colleen L LauCentre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8288-4169

Funding

Australian National Health and Medical Research Council APP1158469Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1190754
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The elimination of lymphatic filariasis (LF) as a public health problem remains an ongoing challenge in the Pacific region. This study reports on antigen (Ag) and microfilaria (Mf) prevalence in Samoa in 2019, 7-9 months after the completion of the first round of triple-drug mass drug administration (MDA). It evaluates the effectiveness of the intervention for reducing Ag prevalence to below a 2% threshold, and how this differs between 5-9-year-olds and ≥10-year-olds. We surveyed 30 randomly selected and five purposefully selected primary sampling units (PSUs) in Samoa in 2018 (1-3 months post-triple-drug MDA) and, again, in 2019. In each PSU, we conducted a community survey of 15-20 households and a convenience survey of 5-9-year-old children. A finger-prick blood sample was collected from all participants to test for Ag and Mf. Demographic details were also collected. There was no significant change in adjusted Ag prevalence in the 30 randomly selected PSUs between 2018 (3.9% [95% CI: 2.7-5.6%]) and 2019 (4.1% [95% CI 2.7-5.9%]). Significantly higher Ag prevalence was observed in participants aged ≥10 years (4.6%, 95% CIs 3.0-6.7%) compared to 5-9-year-olds (1.1%, 95% CIs 0.5-2.2%), supporting existing evidence that post-MDA surveillance should not be based on Ag prevalence among 6-7-year-olds. A single round of triple-drug MDA was insufficient to break LF transmission in Samoa 7-9 months post-MDA.

Indexed as

disease surveillancelymphatic filariasis eliminationPacific regionWuchereria bancrofti

Identifiers

PMID39728838
PMCPMC11680324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.