ArticleToxins2024
Antivenom Administration After Rattlesnake Envenoming in Arizona Does Not Directly Diminish Pain.
Article in Toxins, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The onset, progression, and severity of pain following rattlesnake envenomation are highly variable between patients. Pain can be severe and persistent, seemingly refractory to opioid analgesics. The ability of antivenom to directly relieve pain has not been well studied. We reviewed poison center charts of rattlesnake envenomations between 1 January 2018, and 31 December 2022. Demographic data as well as details of antivenom usage and pain severity were collected. Patients were coded in one of three categories: without pain (Pain 0), well controlled pain (Pain 1), and opioid refractory pain (Pain 2). A total of 289 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 140 receiving Anavip antivenom and 149 receiving Crofab. Patient characteristics were different between both cohorts. There were no significant differences in the number of Anavip vials used between the Pain 1 and Pain 2 groups. However, patients in the Crofab Pain 2 group received more antivenom compared to Pain 1. Importantly, Pain 3 patients were treated with the highest amount of antivenom in both the Crofab and Anavip cohorts. Despite the higher doses of antivenom used, these patients also experienced the greatest pain. These data suggest that antivenom alone may have minimal analgesic benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.