ArticleMembranes2024
Fouling and Chemical Cleaning Strategies for Submerged Ultrafiltration Membrane: Synchronized Bench-Scale, Full-Scale, and Engineering Tests.
Article in Membranes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated membrane fouling issues associated with the operation of a submerged ultrafiltration membrane in a drinking water treatment plant (DWTP) and optimized the associated chemical cleaning strategies. By analyzing the surface components of the membrane foulant and the compositions of the membrane cleaning solution, the primary causes of membrane fouling were identified. Membrane fouling control strategies suitable for the DWTP were evaluated through chemical cleaning tests conducted for bench-scale, full-scale, and engineering cases. The results show that the membrane foulants were primarily composed of a mixture of inorganics and organics; the inorganics were mainly composed of Al and Si, while the organics were primarily humic acid (HA). Sodium citrate proved to be the most effective cleaning agent for inorganic fouling, which was mainly composed of Al, whereas sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) combined with sodium hydroxide (NaOH) showed the best removal efficiency for organic fouling, which predominantly consisted of HA and Si. However, sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) combined with sodium hydroxide (NaOH) showed the best removal efficiency for organic fouling and Si; organic fouling predominantly consisted of HA. Based on the bench-scale test results, flux recovery was verified in the full-scale system. Under a constant pressure of 30 kPa, the combined acid-alkali cleaning achieved the best flux recovery, restoring the flux from 22.8 L/(m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.