ReviewNeuroSci2024
The Influence of Anesthesia on Neuromonitoring During Scoliosis Surgery: A Systematic Review.
Review in NeuroSci, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring in Spinal Deformity Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Global spine journal · 2026Review
- Mivacurium Infusion ED50/ED95 for Maintaining Motor Evoked Potentials During Adolescent Scoliosis Surgery Under TIVA: A Modified Dixon Up-and-Down Sequential Dose-Finding Study.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Article
- Practice advisory on the management of the perioperative period of scoliosis correction surgery.Journal of anesthesia and translational medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) is crucial for the safety of scoliosis surgery, providing real-time feedback on the spinal cord and nerve function, primarily through motor-evoked potentials (MEPs). The choice of anesthesia plays a crucial role in influencing the quality and reliability of these neuromonitoring signals. This systematic review evaluates how different anesthetic techniques-total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA), volatile anesthetics, and regional anesthesia approaches such as Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB), spinal, and epidural anesthesia-affect IONM during scoliosis surgery.
methodsA systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies published between 2017 and 2024 that examined the impact of anesthetic techniques on neuromonitoring during scoliosis surgery. The focus was on studies reporting MEP outcomes, anesthetic protocols, and postoperative neurological and analgesic effects.
resultsThe search initially identified 998 articles. After applying inclusion criteria based on relevance, recency, methodological quality, and citation frequency, 45 studies were selected for detailed review.
conclusionThe erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) provides distinct benefits over spinal and epidural anesthesia in scoliosis surgery, particularly in maintaining neuromonitoring accuracy, reducing hemodynamic instability, and minimizing complications. The ESPB's ability to deliver effective segmental analgesia without compromising motor function makes it a safer and more efficient option for postoperative pain management, enhancing patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.