ArticleMethods and protocols2024
Proof of Concept Study: Comparison of Semi-Automated RNA Isolation Methods from Archived Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissues with Clinical Routine RNA Isolation Methods.
Article in Methods and protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-quality RNA is crucial in clinical diagnostics and precision medicine. Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues pose a challenge due to nucleic acid fragmentation and crosslinking. In this pilot study, various commercially available techniques for extracting RNA from small FFPE samples were compared. We evaluated the KingFisher Duo automated system or the manual MagMAX FFPE DNA/RNA Ultra Kit as an RNA extraction method combined with either a xylene, d-limonene, or AutoLys M tubes deparaffinization method. Additionally, the automated Maxwell RSC RNA FFPE kit and the High Pure FFPET RNA Isolation Kit were examined using FFPE samples from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, as well as samples from ovarian, kidney, and breast cancer and the skin. The KingFisher Duo system gave a higher yield and more consistent RNA quantities, especially from small volumes of IBD samples, compared to manual extraction. The deparaffinization method also impacted results, with AutoLys M tubes proving effective in combination with the KingFisher Duo system. Conversely, the High Pure kit exhibited higher yields for larger FFPE samples. While RNA integrity is a critical factor, particularly for messenger RNA (mRNA) expression studies, its role is less prominent in microRNA (miRNA) analyses. Recognizing this, our study focused on RNA yield and purity (A260/A230) to evaluate RNA extraction methods for various sample types. These findings emphasize the importance of selecting appropriate RNA extraction methods based on sample characteristics and research goals, highlighting the performance of automated methods and the impact of deparaffinization choices. The findings contribute to refining RNA extraction for molecular biology analyses, suggesting avenues for further exploration, including cost-effectiveness under specific experimental conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.