Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39728613›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of ophthalmology2025

Management of Graves' upper eyelid retraction (GUER): A review.

Akruti Desai, Pallavi Singh, Dan Rootman, Milind N Naik

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Akruti DesaiOphthalmic Plastic Surgery Service, Shantilal Shanghvi Eye Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Pallavi SinghJules Stein Eye Institute, UCLA, Los Angeles, USA.
Dan RootmanJules Stein Eye Institute, UCLA, Los Angeles, USA.
Milind N NaikHariram Motumal Nasta and Renu Hariram Nasta Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery Service, L.V. Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graves' disease, a common autoimmune disorder, characteristically presents with upper eyelid retraction, causing significant functional and cosmetic concerns for affected individuals. The management of Graves' upper eyelid retraction has evolved significantly over recent years, with various surgical and non-surgical interventions. An ideal procedure is predictable and easily repeatable. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the contemporary approaches to managing Graves' upper eyelid retraction, encompassing both traditional and emerging techniques. It critically evaluates the surgical options for correcting Graves' upper eyelid retraction to achieve the desired eyelid contour, eyelid crease, tarsal platform show, and brow fat span. Their comparative effectiveness is meticulously explored, offering clinicians valuable insights into treatment selection. Moreover, this review also underscores combined orbital decompression with levator recession. Additionally, advancements in non-invasive modalities, including botulinum toxin, triamcinolone acetate injections, and hyaluronic acid fillers are discussed in detail. This review aims to facilitate informed decision-making and improve the overall outcomes for individuals affected by Graves' disease-associated upper eyelid retraction.

Indexed as

BlepharoplastyDisease ManagementEyelid DiseasesEyelidsGraves DiseaseGraves OphthalmopathyOculomotor MusclesDecompression, SurgicalHumans

Identifiers

PMID39728613
PMCPMC11991553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.