ReviewJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Current Analytical Methods and Challenges for the Clinical Diagnosis of Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis Infection.
Review in Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional and molecular characterization ofJournal of medical microbiology · 2026Article
- The complexity of invasive fungal diseases in the intensive care unit: evaluation of metagenomic next-generation sequencing.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Comparative performance of Filamentous Fungi 4.0 and Mass Spectrometry Identification 2.0 databases for Aspergillus spp.: identification using a simplified protein extraction method.Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo · 2026Article
- Isavuconazole-Amphotericin B and Isavuconazole-Caspofungin In Vitro Synergic Activity Against Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis Molds Isolates.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Establishment of sensitive sandwich-type chemiluminescence immunoassay forFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the last decade, pulmonary fungal infections such as invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) have increased in incidence due to the increased number of immunocompromised individuals. This increase is especially problematic when considering mortality rates associated with IPA are upwards of 70%. This high mortality rate is due to, in part, the length of time it takes to diagnose a patient with IPA. When diagnosed early, mortality rates of IPA decrease by as much as 30%. In this review, we discuss current technologies employed in both medical and research laboratories to diagnose IPA, including culture, imaging, polymerase chain reaction, peptide nucleic acid-fluorescence in situ hybridization, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, lateral flow assay, and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. For each technique, we discuss both promising results and potential areas for improvement that would lead to decreased diagnosis time for patients suspected of contracting IPA. Further study into methods that offer increased speed and both analytical and clinical sensitivity to decrease diagnosis time for IPA is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.