Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39728287›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2024

Predictors of the Need for Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement with a Biological Prosthesis and the Effect on Long-Term Survival.

Ivo Deblier, Karl Dossche, Anthony Vanermen, Wilhelm Mistiaen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ivo DeblierDepartment Cardiovascular Surgery, ZNA Middelheim Hospital, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0009-0007-0809-2594
Karl DosscheDepartment Cardiovascular Surgery, ZNA Middelheim Hospital, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium.
Anthony VanermenDepartment Cardiovascular Surgery, ZNA Middelheim Hospital, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium.
Wilhelm MistiaenFaculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8583-2524

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The need for a permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation after surgical aortic valve implantation (SAVR) is a recognized postoperative complication, with potentially long-term reduced survival. From 1987 to 2017, 2500 consecutive patients underwent SAVR with a biological valve with or without concomitant procedures such as CABG or mitral valve repair. Mechanical valves or valves in another position were excluded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. The need for PPM implantation was documented in 2.7% of the cases. Patients with a postoperative PPM were older and had higher risk scores and a higher comorbid burden. Its predictors were a prior SAVR (odds ratio of 5.38,

Indexed as

permanent pacemaker implantpredictorsurgical aortic valve replacementsurvival

Identifiers

PMID39728287
PMCPMC11677495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.