ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2024
Evaluating Binary Classifiers for Cardiovascular Disease Prediction: Enhancing Early Diagnostic Capabilities.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leakage-Safe Precision-Aware Dual-Branch FT-Transformer for Population-Scale Heart Disease Risk Prediction.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Reply to Eltawil et al. Comment on "Iacobescu et al. Evaluating Binary Classifiers for Cardiovascular Disease Prediction: Enhancing Early Diagnostic Capabilities.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Comment on Iacobescu et al. Evaluating Binary Classifiers for Cardiovascular Disease Prediction: Enhancing Early Diagnostic Capabilities.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Predicting periprosthetic joint Infection: Evaluating supervised machine learning models for clinical application.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2025Article
- The Potential of Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Sepsis: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Enhancing one-year mortality prediction in STEMI patients post-PCI: an interpretable machine learning model with risk stratification.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Automated predictive framework using AI and deep learning approaches for early detection and classification of liver cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Enhanced machine learning and hybrid ensemble approaches for Coronary Heart Disease prediction.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a significant global health concern and the leading cause of death in many countries. Early detection and diagnosis of CVD can significantly reduce the risk of complications and mortality. Machine learning methods, particularly classification algorithms, have demonstrated their potential to accurately predict the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) by analyzing patient data. This study evaluates seven binary classification algorithms, including Random Forests, Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes, K-Nearest Neighbors (kNN), Support Vector Machines, Gradient Boosting, and Artificial Neural Networks, to understand their effectiveness in predicting CVD. Advanced preprocessing techniques, such as SMOTE-ENN for addressing class imbalance and hyperparameter optimization through Grid Search Cross-Validation, were applied to enhance the reliability and performance of these models. Standard evaluation metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (ROC-AUC), were used to assess predictive capabilities. The results show that kNN achieved the highest accuracy (99%) and AUC (0.99), surpassing traditional models like Logistic Regression and Gradient Boosting. The study examines the challenges encountered when working with datasets related to cardiovascular diseases, such as class imbalance and feature selection. It demonstrates how addressing these issues enhances the reliability and applicability of predictive models. These findings emphasize the potential of kNN as a reliable tool for early CVD prediction, offering significant improvements over previous studies. This research highlights the value of advanced machine learning techniques in healthcare, addressing key challenges and laying a foundation for future studies aimed at improving predictive models for CVD prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.