Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39728233›Full record

ArticleJournal of functional morphology and kinesiology2024

The Multi-Component Structure of Core Strength.

Sarah Schulte, Jessica Bopp, Volker Zschorlich, Dirk Büsch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah SchulteInstitute of Sport Science, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany.
Jessica BoppInstitute of Sport Science, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2406-3746
Volker ZschorlichInstitute of Sport Science, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8158-6223
Dirk BüschInstitute of Sport Science, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2632-5308

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesCore strength diagnostics often focus on measuring core endurance rather than maximal core strength or core power. This study investigates whether core strength can be considered as a general ability that can be measured by a single core strength test or whether it needs to be differentiated into several components.

methodsForty-two adult sports students (

resultsA principal component analysis (PCA) extracted three principal components from twelve different core strength variables. The three identified components explained 73.3% of the total variance and were labeled as (a) maximal core strength, (b) core endurance, and (c) core power.

conclusionsThe results suggest three principal components of the core strength construct, as well as their differentiation, may be imperative. These findings should be taken into account in sport science and sports practice as they may be helpful in planning sport-specific diagnostic, performance-oriented training, and injury prevention programs.

Indexed as

core endurancecore powerdiagnosticsforce-differentiated approachmaximal core strengthprincipal component analysis

Identifiers

PMID39728233
PMCPMC11678708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.