ArticleJournal of imaging2024
Towards Robust Supervised Pectoral Muscle Segmentation in Mammography Images.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Associations of Normalization and Regularization with Machine Learning Overfitting in Cross-dataset Classification of Deaths Using Transcriptomic and Clinical Data: A Secondary Analysis of Publicly Available Databases.Journal of clinical and translational pathology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mammography images are the most commonly used tool for breast cancer screening. The presence of pectoral muscle in images for the mediolateral oblique view makes designing a robust automated breast cancer detection system more challenging. Most of the current methods for removing the pectoral muscle are based on traditional machine learning approaches. This is partly due to the lack of segmentation masks of pectoral muscle in available datasets. In this paper, we provide the segmentation masks of the pectoral muscle for the INbreast, MIAS, and CBIS-DDSM datasets, which will enable the development of supervised methods and the utilization of deep learning. Training deep learning-based models using segmentation masks will also be a powerful tool for removing pectoral muscle for unseen data. To test the validity of this idea, we trained AU-Net separately on the INbreast and CBIS-DDSM for the segmentation of the pectoral muscle. We used cross-dataset testing to evaluate the performance of the models on an unseen dataset. In addition, the models were tested on all of the images in the MIAS dataset. The experimental results show that cross-dataset testing achieves a comparable performance to the same-dataset experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.