Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39728224›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2024

Optimization of Cocoa Pods Maturity Classification Using Stacking and Voting with Ensemble Learning Methods in RGB and LAB Spaces.

Kacoutchy Jean Ayikpa, Abou Bakary Ballo, Diarra Mamadou, Pierre Gouton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kacoutchy Jean AyikpaLaboratoire Imagerie et Vision Artificielle (ImVia), Université de Bourgogne, 21000 Dijon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1209-5874
Abou Bakary BalloLaboratoire de Mécanique et Information (LaMI), Université Felix Houphouët-Boigny, Abidjan 22 BP 801, Côte d'Ivoire.
Diarra MamadouLaboratoire Imagerie et Vision Artificielle (ImVia), Université de Bourgogne, 21000 Dijon, France.
Pierre GoutonLaboratoire Imagerie et Vision Artificielle (ImVia), Université de Bourgogne, 21000 Dijon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determining the maturity of cocoa pods early is not just about guaranteeing harvest quality and optimizing yield. It is also about efficient resource management. Rapid identification of the stage of maturity helps avoid losses linked to a premature or late harvest, improving productivity. Early determination of cocoa pod maturity ensures both the quality and quantity of the harvest, as immature or overripe pods cannot produce premium cocoa beans. Our innovative research harnesses artificial intelligence and computer vision technologies to revolutionize the cocoa industry, offering precise and advanced tools for accurately assessing cocoa pod maturity. Providing an objective and rapid assessment enables farmers to make informed decisions about the optimal time to harvest, helping to maximize the yield of their plantations. Furthermore, by automating this process, these technologies reduce the margins for human error and improve the management of agricultural resources. With this in mind, our study proposes to exploit a computer vision method based on the GLCM (gray level co-occurrence matrix) algorithm to extract the characteristics of images in the RGB (red, green, blue) and LAB (luminance, axis between red and green, axis between yellow and blue) color spaces. This approach allows for in-depth image analysis, which is essential for capturing the nuances of cocoa pod maturity. Next, we apply classification algorithms to identify the best performers. These algorithms are then combined via stacking and voting techniques, allowing our model to be optimized by taking advantage of the strengths of each method, thus guaranteeing more robust and precise results. The results demonstrated that the combination of algorithms produced superior performance, especially in the LAB color space, where voting scored 98.49% and stacking 98.71%. In comparison, in the RGB color space, voting scored 96.59% and stacking 97.06%. These results surpass those generally reported in the literature, showing the increased effectiveness of combined approaches in improving the accuracy of classification models. This highlights the importance of exploring ensemble techniques to maximize performance in complex contexts such as cocoa pod maturity classification.

Indexed as

cocoa podcolor spacesensemble learningGLCMmachine learningstackingvoting

Identifiers

PMID39728224
PMCPMC11727684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.