ArticleJournal of imaging2024
Point-Cloud Instance Segmentation for Spinning Laser Sensors.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Point-Cloud Instance Segmentation for Spinning Laser Sensors.Journal of imaging · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this paper, we face the point-cloud segmentation problem for spinning laser sensors from a deep-learning (DL) perspective. Since the sensors natively provide their measurements in a 2D grid, we directly use state-of-the-art models designed for visual information for the segmentation task and then exploit the range information to ensure 3D accuracy. This allows us to effectively address the main challenges of applying DL techniques to point clouds, i.e., lack of structure and increased dimensionality. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that faces the 3D segmentation problem from a 2D perspective without explicitly re-projecting 3D point clouds. Moreover, our approach exploits multiple channels available in modern sensors, i.e., range, reflectivity, and ambient illumination. We also introduce a novel data-mining pipeline that enables the annotation of 3D scans without human intervention. Together with this paper, we present a new public dataset with all the data collected for training and evaluating our approach, where point clouds preserve their native sensor structure and where every single measurement contains range, reflectivity, and ambient information, together with its associated 3D point. As experimental results show, our approach achieves state-of-the-art results both in terms of performance and inference time. Additionally, we provide a novel ablation test that analyses the individual and combined contributions of the different channels provided by modern laser sensors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.