Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39728222›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2024

Point-Cloud Instance Segmentation for Spinning Laser Sensors.

Alvaro Casado-Coscolla, Carlos Sanchez-Belenguer, Erik Wolfart, Vitor Sequeira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alvaro Casado-CoscollaEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Via Enrico Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5179-1541
Carlos Sanchez-BelenguerEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Via Enrico Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8218-7619
Erik WolfartEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Via Enrico Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0489-932X
Vitor SequeiraEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Via Enrico Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8878-4193

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we face the point-cloud segmentation problem for spinning laser sensors from a deep-learning (DL) perspective. Since the sensors natively provide their measurements in a 2D grid, we directly use state-of-the-art models designed for visual information for the segmentation task and then exploit the range information to ensure 3D accuracy. This allows us to effectively address the main challenges of applying DL techniques to point clouds, i.e., lack of structure and increased dimensionality. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that faces the 3D segmentation problem from a 2D perspective without explicitly re-projecting 3D point clouds. Moreover, our approach exploits multiple channels available in modern sensors, i.e., range, reflectivity, and ambient illumination. We also introduce a novel data-mining pipeline that enables the annotation of 3D scans without human intervention. Together with this paper, we present a new public dataset with all the data collected for training and evaluating our approach, where point clouds preserve their native sensor structure and where every single measurement contains range, reflectivity, and ambient information, together with its associated 3D point. As experimental results show, our approach achieves state-of-the-art results both in terms of performance and inference time. Additionally, we provide a novel ablation test that analyses the individual and combined contributions of the different channels provided by modern laser sensors.

Indexed as

3D data mining3D instance segmentationdeep learningLiDAR

Identifiers

PMID39728222
PMCPMC11728245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.