ArticleJournal of imaging2024
MediScan: A Framework of U-Health and Prognostic AI Assessment on Medical Imaging.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation Frameworks for Clinical Foundation Models in Specific Tasks of Unstructured Medical Text Analysis: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- GAINSeq: glaucoma pre-symptomatic detection using machine learning models driven by next-generation sequencing data.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With technological advancements, remarkable progress has been made with the convergence of health sciences and Artificial Intelligence (AI). Modern health systems are proposed to ease patient diagnostics. However, the challenge is to provide AI-based precautions to patients and doctors for more accurate risk assessment. The proposed healthcare system aims to integrate patients, doctors, laboratories, pharmacies, and administrative personnel use cases and their primary functions onto a single platform. The proposed framework can also process microscopic images, CT scans, X-rays, and MRI to classify malignancy and give doctors a set of AI precautions for patient risk assessment. The proposed framework incorporates various DCNN models for identifying different forms of tumors and fractures in the human body i.e., brain, bones, lungs, kidneys, and skin, and generating precautions with the help of the Fined-Tuned Large Language Model (LLM) i.e., Generative Pretrained Transformer 4 (GPT-4). With enough training data, DCNN can learn highly representative, data-driven, hierarchical image features. The GPT-4 model is selected for generating precautions due to its explanation, reasoning, memory, and accuracy on prior medical assessments and research studies. Classification models are evaluated by classification report (i.e., Recall, Precision, F1 Score, Support, Accuracy, and Macro and Weighted Average) and confusion matrix and have shown robust performance compared to the conventional schemes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.