Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39728213›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2024

Toward Closing the Loop in Image-to-Image Conversion in Radiotherapy: A Quality Control Tool to Predict Synthetic Computed Tomography Hounsfield Unit Accuracy.

Paolo Zaffino, Ciro Benito Raggio, Adrian Thummerer, Gabriel Guterres Marmitt, Johannes Albertus Langendijk, Anna Procopio, Carlo Cosentino, Joao Seco, Antje Christin Knopf, Stefan Both and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Paolo ZaffinoDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University, viale Europa, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0219-0157
Ciro Benito RaggioInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID 0009-0008-2443-4029
Adrian ThummererDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9712 CP Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1874-5030
Gabriel Guterres MarmittDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9712 CP Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8486-7001
Johannes Albertus LangendijkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9712 CP Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1083-372X
Anna ProcopioDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University, viale Europa, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3639-8714
Carlo CosentinoDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University, viale Europa, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5768-1829
Joao SecoDepartment of Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, Deutsches Krebsfoschungszentrum (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9458-2202
Antje Christin KnopfInstitute for Medical Engineering and Medical Informatics, School of Life Science FHNW, 4132 Muttenz, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8212-571X
Stefan BothDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9712 CP Groningen, The Netherlands.
Maria Francesca SpadeaInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5339-9583

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, synthetic Computed Tomography (CT) images generated from Magnetic Resonance (MR) or Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) acquisitions have been shown to be comparable to real CT images in terms of dose computation for radiotherapy simulation. However, until now, there has been no independent strategy to assess the quality of each synthetic image in the absence of ground truth. In this work, we propose a Deep Learning (DL)-based framework to predict the accuracy of synthetic CT in terms of Mean Absolute Error (MAE) without the need for a ground truth (GT). The proposed algorithm generates a volumetric map as an output, informing clinicians of the predicted MAE slice-by-slice. A cascading multi-model architecture was used to deal with the complexity of the MAE prediction task. The workflow was trained and tested on two cohorts of head and neck cancer patients with different imaging modalities: 27 MR scans and 33 CBCT. The algorithm evaluation revealed an accurate HU prediction (a median absolute prediction deviation equal to 4 HU for CBCT-based synthetic CTs and 6 HU for MR-based synthetic CTs), with discrepancies that do not affect the clinical decisions made on the basis of the proposed estimation. The workflow exhibited no systematic error in MAE prediction. This work represents a proof of concept about the feasibility of synthetic CT evaluation in daily clinical practice, and it paves the way for future patient-specific quality assessment strategies.

Indexed as

conversion predictiondeep learningMR-only adaptive radiotherapysynthetic CT

Identifiers

PMID39728213
PMCPMC11679912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.