Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39728208›Full record

ReviewJournal of imaging2024

State-of-the-Art Deep Learning Methods for Microscopic Image Segmentation: Applications to Cells, Nuclei, and Tissues.

Fatma Krikid, Hugo Rositi, Antoine Vacavant

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fatma KrikidInstitut Pascal, CNRS, Clermont Auvergne INP, Université Clermont Auvergne, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Hugo RositiLORIA, CNRS, Université de Lorraine, F-54000 Nancy, France.
Antoine VacavantInstitut Pascal, CNRS, Clermont Auvergne INP, Université Clermont Auvergne, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9616-3282

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microscopic image segmentation (MIS) is a fundamental task in medical imaging and biological research, essential for precise analysis of cellular structures and tissues. Despite its importance, the segmentation process encounters significant challenges, including variability in imaging conditions, complex biological structures, and artefacts (e.g., noise), which can compromise the accuracy of traditional methods. The emergence of deep learning (DL) has catalyzed substantial advancements in addressing these issues. This systematic literature review (SLR) provides a comprehensive overview of state-of-the-art DL methods developed over the past six years for the segmentation of microscopic images. We critically analyze key contributions, emphasizing how these methods specifically tackle challenges in cell, nucleus, and tissue segmentation. Additionally, we evaluate the datasets and performance metrics employed in these studies. By synthesizing current advancements and identifying gaps in existing approaches, this review not only highlights the transformative potential of DL in enhancing diagnostic accuracy and research efficiency but also suggests directions for future research. The findings of this study have significant implications for improving methodologies in medical and biological applications, ultimately fostering better patient outcomes and advancing scientific understanding.

Indexed as

biologycell segmentationdeep learningimage segmentationmicroscopic imagenucleus segmentationtissue analysis

Identifiers

PMID39728208
PMCPMC11679639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.