ArticleJournal of imaging2024
UV Hyperspectral Imaging with Xenon and Deuterium Light Sources: Integrating PCA and Neural Networks for Analysis of Different Raw Cotton Types.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From ADAS to Material-Informed Inspection: Review of Hyperspectral Imaging Applications on Mobile Ground Robots.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ultraviolet (UV) hyperspectral imaging shows significant promise for the classification and quality assessment of raw cotton, a key material in the textile industry. This study evaluates the efficacy of UV hyperspectral imaging (225-408 nm) using two different light sources: xenon arc (XBO) and deuterium lamps, in comparison to NIR hyperspectral imaging. The aim is to determine which light source provides better differentiation between cotton types in UV hyperspectral imaging, as each interacts differently with the materials, potentially affecting imaging quality and classification accuracy. Principal component analysis (PCA) and Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA) were employed to differentiate between various cotton types and hemp plant. PCA for the XBO illumination revealed that the first three principal components (PCs) accounted for 94.8% of the total variance: PC1 (78.4%) and PC2 (11.6%) clustered the samples into four main groups-hemp (HP), recycled cotton (RcC), and organic cotton (OC) from the other cotton samples-while PC3 (6%) further separated RcC. When using the deuterium light source, the first three PCs explained 89.4% of the variance, effectively distinguishing sample types such as HP, RcC, and OC from the remaining samples, with PC3 clearly separating RcC. When combining the PCA scores with QDA, the classification accuracy reached 76.1% for the XBO light source and 85.1% for the deuterium light source. Furthermore, a deep learning technique called a fully connected neural network for classification was applied. The classification accuracy for the XBO and deuterium light sources reached 83.6% and 90.1%, respectively. The results highlight the ability of this method to differentiate conventional and organic cotton, as well as hemp, and to identify distinct types of recycled cotton, suggesting varying recycling processes and possible common origins with raw cotton. These findings underscore the potential of UV hyperspectral imaging, coupled with chemometric models, as a powerful tool for enhancing cotton classification accuracy in the textile industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.