ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2024
Evaluation of Internal Fit in Custom-Made Posts and Cores Fabricated with Fully Digital Versus Conventional Techniques.
Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the Trueness and Precision of Cast, Milled-Cast, Milled, and 3D-Printed Post-and-Core Techniques Using Matching Software: An In Vitro Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
- Effect of Different Impression and Fabrication Techniques on the Precision of Custom Metal Posts: Fully Digital, Semi-Digital, and Conventional.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to assess and compare the internal fit of custom-made posts and cores fabricated using digital impressions (DI) and conventional vinyl polysiloxane (VPS) impressions in restorative dentistry. MATERIALS AND
methodsA typodont tooth model, simulating the anatomy of the root canal of a central incisor, was utilized for the study. Two groups were formed, Group A and Group B, and each group provided a total of 18 impressions of two types: DIs and VPS impressions. In Group A, posts and cores (PCs) were fabricated using Selective Laser Melting (SLM) from the DIs. Meanwhile, in Group B, conventionally cast (CC) PCs were created from the VPS impressions. Silicone replicas of the internal surfaces were produced, and measurements were made at seven different points for each group. A statistical analysis was performed to assess the differences in internal fit between the two impression techniques.
resultsThe results revealed a statistically significant difference in mean internal fit between Group A (DI and SLM) and Group B (VPS and CC), with Group A exhibiting a mean internal fit of 182.6 µm and Group B showing a mean of 205.9 µm. While both groups demonstrated considerable variability in internal fit measurements, the digital impression technique showed promise for achieving superior internal fit, with a significantly greater fit for measuring points on sides and the most apical part of the post for Group A. Variations were observed across different measuring points, emphasizing the impact of impression technique on specific regions within the tooth.
conclusionThis study contributes to the growing body of knowledge in digital dentistry by highlighting the potential benefits of DIs in achieving a superior internal fit for custom-made PCs. Clinicians may consider the advantages of digital techniques to enhance the precision of their restorative procedures, although further research is warranted to evaluate the clinical impact of these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.