Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39728167›Full record

ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2024

Machine Learning and Metabolomics Predict Mesenchymal Stem Cell Osteogenic Differentiation in 2D and 3D Cultures.

Michail E Klontzas, Spyros I Vernardis, Aristea Batsali, Fotios Papadogiannis, Nicki Panoskaltsis, Athanasios Mantalaris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Machine Learning in Stem Cell Research: From Biological Data to Clinical Translation.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michail E KlontzasArtificial Intelligence and Translational Imaging (ATI) Lab, Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-2731-933X
Spyros I VernardisThe Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 1AT, UK.
Aristea BatsaliHaemopoiesis Research Laboratory, School of Medicine, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece.
Fotios PapadogiannisHaemopoiesis Research Laboratory, School of Medicine, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece.
Nicki PanoskaltsisBioMedical Systems Engineering Laboratory, Panoz Institute, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Trinity College, D02 PN40 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-8972-5697
Athanasios MantalarisBioMedical Systems Engineering Laboratory, Panoz Institute, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Trinity College, D02 PN40 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-6183-0292

Funding

European Union 675585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stem cells have been widely used to produce artificial bone grafts. Nonetheless, the variability in the degree of stem cell differentiation is an inherent drawback of artificial graft development and requires robust evaluation tools that can certify the quality of stem cell-based products and avoid source-tissue-related and patient-specific variability in outcomes. Omics analyses have been utilised for the evaluation of stem cell attributes in all stages of stem cell biomanufacturing. Herein, metabolomics in combination with machine learning was utilised for the benchmarking of osteogenic differentiation quality in 2D and 3D cultures. Metabolomics analysis was performed with the use of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). A set of 11 metabolites was used to train an XGboost model which achieved excellent performance in distinguishing between differentiated and undifferentiated umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stem cells (UCB MSCs). The model was benchmarked against samples not present in the training set, being able to efficiently capture osteogenesis in 3D UCB MSC cultures with an area under the curve (AUC) of 82.6%. On the contrary, the model did not capture any differentiation in Wharton's Jelly MSC samples, which are well-known underperformers in osteogenic differentiation (AUC of 56.2%). Mineralisation was significantly correlated with the levels of fumarate, glycerol, and myo-inositol, the four metabolites found most important for model performance (R

Indexed as

biomanufacturingdifferentiationmachine learningmesenchymal stem cellsmetabolomicsosteogenesis

Identifiers

PMID39728167
PMCPMC11680063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.