Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39728162›Full record

ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2024

Neural Cell Interactions with a Surgical Grade Biomaterial Using a Simulated Injury in Brain Organotypic Slices.

Jessica Patricia Wiseman, Divya Maitreyi Chari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jessica Patricia WisemanSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele ST5 5BG, UK.
Divya Maitreyi ChariFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences research council EP/L015072/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue engineering research for neurological applications has demonstrated that biomaterial-based structural bridges present a promising approach for promoting regeneration. This is particularly relevant for penetrating traumatic brain injuries, where the clinical prognosis is typically poor, with no available regeneration-enhancing therapies. Specifically, repurposing clinically approved biomaterials offers many advantages (reduced approval time and achieving commercial scaleup for clinical applications), highlighting the need for detailed screening of potential neuromaterials. A major challenge in experimental testing is the limited availability of neuromimetic, technically accessible, cost-effective, and humane models of neurological injury for efficient biomaterial testing in injury-simulated environments. Three dimensional (3D) organotypic brain slices bridge the gap between live animal models and simplified co-cultures and are a versatile tool for studies on neural development, neurodegenerative disease and in drug testing. Despite this, their utility for investigation of neural cell responses to biomaterial implantation is poorly investigated. We demonstrate that murine brain organotypic slices can be used to develop a model of penetrating traumatic brain injury, wherein a surgical-grade biomaterial scaffold can be implanted into the lesion cavity. Critically, the model allowed for examination of key cellular responses involved in CNS injury pathology/biomaterial handling: astrogliosis, microglial activation and axonal sprouting. The approach offers a technically simple and versatile methodology to study biomaterial interventions as a regenerative therapy for neurological injuries.

Indexed as

3D modelbiomaterialsorganotypic slicesscaffoldtraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID39728162
PMCPMC11678806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.