ArticleJournal of Intelligence2024
Predicting the Performance of Students Using Deep Ensemble Learning.
Article in Journal of Intelligence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- SymCART: a symbiotic cognitive-affective reinforcement transformer for optimizing educational interventions.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Can ChatGPT Boost Students' Employment Confidence? A Pioneering Booster for Career Readiness.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Universities and schools rely heavily on the ability to forecast student performance, as it enables them to develop efficient strategies for enhancing academic results and averting student attrition. The automation of processes and the management of large datasets generated by technology-enhanced learning tools can facilitate the analysis and processing of these data, which provides crucial insights into the knowledge of students and their engagement with academic endeavors. The method under consideration aims to forecast the academic achievement of students through an ensemble of deep neural networks. The proposed method presents a new feature-ranking mechanism based on existing approaches. This mechanism is effective in identifying the most pertinent features and their correlation with the academic performance of students. The proposed method employs an optimization strategy to concurrently configure and train the deep neural networks within our ensemble system. Furthermore, the proposed ensemble model uses weighted voting among its learning components for more accurate prediction. Put simply, the suggested approach enhances the accuracy of academic performance predictions for students not only by employing weighted ensemble techniques, but also by optimizing the parameters of deep learning models. These experimental outcomes provide evidence that the proposed method outperformed the alternative approaches, accurately predicting student performance with a root-mean-square error (RMSE) value of 1.66, a Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) value of 9.75, and an R-squared value of 0.7430. These results show a significant improvement compared to the null model (RMSE = 4.05, MAPE = 24.89, and R-squared = 0.2897) and prove the efficiency of the techniques employed in the proposed method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.