Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39727916›Full record

ArticleEuropean burn journal2024

Development of Biofidelic Skin Simulants Based on Fresh Cadaveric Skin Tests.

Gurpreet Singh, Pramod Yadav, Arnab Chanda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European burn journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gurpreet SinghCentre for Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi 110016, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5910-3213
Pramod YadavCentre for Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi 110016, India.
Arnab ChandaCentre for Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi 110016, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of artificial skin that accurately mimics the mechanical properties of human skin is crucial for a wide range of applications, including surgical training for burn injuries, biomechanical testing, and research in sports injuries and ballistics. While traditional materials like gelatin, polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), and animal skins (such as porcine and bovine skins) have been used for these purposes, they have inherent limitations in replicating the intricate properties of human skin. In this work, we conducted uniaxial tensile tests on freshly obtained cadaveric skin to analyze its mechanical properties under various loading conditions. The stress-strain data obtained from these tests were then replicated using advanced skin simulants. These skin simulants were specifically formulated using a cost-effective and moldable multi-part silicone-based polymer. This material was chosen for its ability to accurately replicate the mechanical behavior of human skin while also addressing ethical considerations and biosafety concerns. In addition, the non-linear mechanical behavior of the developed skin simulants was characterized using three different hyperelastic curve-fit models (i.e., Neo-Hookean, Mooney-Rivlin, and Yeoh models). Moreover, these innovative simulants offer an ethical and practical alternative to cadaveric skin for use in laboratory and clinical settings.

Indexed as

cadaveric skinhyperelasticitymechanical testingsimulantsskin tissue

Identifiers

PMID39727916
PMCPMC11727412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.