Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39727893›Full record

ArticleBiosensors2024

Wearable Sensors and Motion Analysis for Neurological Patient Support.

Peter Dabnichki, Toh Yen Pang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biosensors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Peter DabnichkiMechanical, Manufacturing and Mechatronic Engineering, School of Engineering, STEM College, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
Toh Yen PangBiomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, STEM College, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4766-3042

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work discusses the state of the art and challenges in using wearable sensors for the monitoring of neurological patients. The authors share their experience from their participation in numerous projects, ranging from drug trials to rehabilitation intervention assessment, and identify the obstacles in the way of the integrated adoption of wearable sensors in clinical and rehabilitation practices for neurological patients. Several highly promising developments are outlined and analyzed. It is considered that intelligent textiles are an attractive option, as they offer an esthetic outlook to and positive interaction with their users.

Indexed as

Nervous System DiseasesWearable Electronic DevicesBiosensing TechniquesHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicMotionintelligent textilesmonitoringneurology patientsrehabilitationwearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID39727893
PMCPMC11674467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.