ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Edge Artificial Intelligence Device in Real-Time Endoscopy for Classification of Gastric Neoplasms: Development and Validation Study.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- AI in Esophageal Motility Disorders: Systematic Review of High-Resolution Manometry Studies.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- High-precision classification of WCE-based gastrointestinal abnormality using a fusion deep learning approach.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence assistance improves endoscopist accuracy for gastric cancer dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- [Clinical Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy: A Human-Artificial Intelligence Interaction Perspective].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2026Review
- Deep learning-based classification of colonoscopic images using an attention-enhanced ConvNeXt V2 architecture.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Multidimensional decision support by artificial intelligence across the full workflow of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis and Management of Cancers: Potentials and Challenges.MedComm · 2025Review
- Biomimetic Transfer Learning-Based Complex Gastrointestinal Polyp Classification.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Role of artificial intelligence in gastric diseases.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Recent advance in early oral lesion diagnosis: the application of artificial intelligence-assisted endoscopy.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWe previously developed artificial intelligence (AI) diagnosis algorithms for predicting the six classes of stomach lesions. However, this required significant computational resources. The incorporation of AI into medical devices has evolved from centralized models to decentralized edge computing devices. In this study, a deep learning endoscopic image classification model was created to automatically categorize all phases of gastric carcinogenesis using an edge computing device.
designA total of 15,910 endoscopic images were collected retrospectively and randomly assigned to train, validation, and internal-test datasets in an 8:1:1 ratio. The major outcomes were as follows: 1. lesion classification accuracy in six categories: normal/atrophy/intestinal metaplasia/dysplasia/early/advanced gastric cancer; and 2. the prospective evaluation of classification accuracy in real-world procedures.
resultsThe internal-test lesion-classification accuracy was 93.8% (95% confidence interval: 93.4-94.2%); precision was 88.6%, recall was 88.3%, and F1 score was 88.4%. For the prospective performance test, the established model attained an accuracy of 93.3% (91.5-95.1%). The established model's lesion classification inference speed was 2-3 ms on GPU and 5-6 ms on CPU. The expert endoscopists reported no delays in lesion classification or any interference from the deep learning model throughout their exams.
conclusionsWe established a deep learning endoscopic image classification model to automatically classify all stages of gastric carcinogenesis using an edge computing device.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.