ReviewBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
A Comprehensive Review of Treatment Plans for Marginal Enamel Fractures in Anterior Teeth.
Review in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Erosive Resistance of High-Translucency Resin Composites: New Insights for Esthetic Dentistry.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Marginal enamel fractures (MEF) are a common clinical concern in dentistry, particularly in anterior teeth. These fractures occur at the enamel margins and their etiopathogenesis involves a complex interplay of mechanical, chemical, and biological factors. The ongoing research focuses on an overview of MEF to improve the knowledge about this condition. Understanding the multifaceted nature of MEF is crucial for devising effective preventive and therapeutic strategies in contemporary restorative dentistry. Indeed, mechanical stresses, such as occlusal forces and parafunctional habits are primary contributors for MEF. Additionally, it can happen at the enamel-restoration interface due to expansion and contraction of restorative materials. Chemical degradation, including acid erosion and the breakdown of adhesive bonds, further exacerbates the vulnerability of enamel. Biological factors, such as enamel composition and the presence of micro-cracks also play a role in the development of MEF. Clinical management of MEF involves subtractive or additive techniques, repairing or replacing the compromised tooth structure using techniques to ensure the integration with the natural enamel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.