Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39727632›Full record

ReviewDiseases (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Anatomy and Pathologies of the Spinous Process.

Sisith Ariyaratne, Nathan Jenko, Karthikeyan P Iyengar, Mark Davies, Christine Azzopardi, Simon Hughes, Rajesh Botchu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sisith AriyaratneDepartment of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Royal Orthopedic Hospital, Birmingham B31 2AP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7377-028X
Nathan JenkoDepartment of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Royal Orthopedic Hospital, Birmingham B31 2AP, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2882-6923
Karthikeyan P IyengarDepartment of Orthopedics, Southport and Ormskirk Hospitals, Mersey and West Lancashire Teaching NHS Trust, Southport PR8 6PN, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4379-1266
Mark DaviesDepartment of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Royal Orthopedic Hospital, Birmingham B31 2AP, UK.
Christine AzzopardiDepartment of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Royal Orthopedic Hospital, Birmingham B31 2AP, UK.
Simon HughesDepartment of Spinal Surgery, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham B31 2AP, UK.
Rajesh BotchuDepartment of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Royal Orthopedic Hospital, Birmingham B31 2AP, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7998-2980

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spinous processes act as a lever for attachments of muscles and ligaments. Spinal imaging is commonly performed as a diagnostic test for pain and radiculopathy. A myriad of incidental or unexpected findings, both potentially asymptomatic and symptomatic, may be encountered during the interpretation of these images, which commonly comprise radiographs, Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Isolated lesions of the spinous process, although less common, are some of the lesions that may be encountered and can present a diagnostic dilemma. These can range from congenital abnormalities, traumatic lesions, neoplasms and lesions of inflammatory, infective and metabolic aetiology. The literature specifically reviewing these lesions is sparse. The article reviews a range of pathologies affecting the spinous process, along with their pertinent imaging features, based on isolated pathologies of spinous process lesions identified on imaging by the authors at a tertiary orthopaedic centre over a 10-year period. A search on the hospital Picture Archive and Communication System (PACS) and Radiology Information System (RIS) was performed using the keyword "spinous process" and a list of the isolated pathologies of the spinous process based on the imaging reports was compiled for the purpose of this narrative review. It is important that radiologists consider these lesions when they are identified on routine imaging of the spine.

Indexed as

baastrup diseasecomputed tomographycongenitalmagnetic resonance imagingneoplasmneuroimagingspinous process

Identifiers

PMID39727632
PMCPMC11726990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.