ArticleDermatopathology (Basel, Switzerland)2024
PRAME Staining of Adnexal Lesions and Common Skin Cancer Types: Biomarker with Potential Diagnostic Utility.
Article in Dermatopathology (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cutaneous Adnexal Tumours in an Eastern European Cohort: Clinicopathological Spectrum and Rare Malignant Lesions.Cancers · 2026Article
- Therapeutic Opportunities in Melanoma Through PRAME Expression.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- PRAME positive spiradenocarcinoma treated with Mohs micrographic surgery.JAAD case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma) is a tumor-associated antigen first identified in tumor-reactive T-cell clones derived from a patient with metastatic melanoma. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for PRAME is useful for diagnostic purposes to support a suspected diagnosis of melanoma. Anecdotally, PRAME has been observed to stain sebaceous units in glands in background skin. We examined the expression of PRAME in adnexal lesions and common skin cancers to determine whether it is of potential diagnostic utility in supporting the differentiation between sebaceous and non-sebaceous lesions. IRB approval from Mount Sinai Medical Center (MSMC) was obtained. This is a single-center retrospective cohort analysis over a ten-year period (1 January 2012, and 31 December 2023). We used the pathological database of skin lesions, including sebaceous, sweat gland, and follicular lesions, in addition to basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) and squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs), from 81 patients who underwent shave/punch biopsies or surgical excisions. We evaluated the IHC staining percentage positivity and intensity for PRAME. Staining intensity was subcategorized into negative, weak, moderate, and strong, whereas expression percentage positivity was subcategorized into 0%, 1-25%, 26-50%, 51-75%, and 76-100%. Most sebaceous versus non-sebaceous lesions exhibited cytoplasmic staining of moderate to strong intensity in >75% of cells. PRAME has a sensitivity and specificity of 100.0% and 86.7%, respectively, to support distinguishing between sebaceous and non-sebaceous adnexal lesions (regardless of whether they are benign or malignant). BCCs and SCCs showed weak to moderate nuclear staining for PRAME in >75% of cells. None of the 13 lesions of hair follicle origin showed any staining. A total of 26 of the 32 lesions of sweat gland origin were negative while 6 (18.75%) showed positive staining. In conclusion, we confirm the potential utility of PRAME for supporting the distinction between sebaceous and non-sebaceous adnexal lesions on one hand, and on the other, distinguishing BCC and SCC that may show nuclear staining from sebaceous carcinoma that shows cytoplasmic staining.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.