ArticleGels (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Preparation and Characterization of Ultrasonically Modified Peanut Protein-Guar Gum Composite Emulsion Gels for 3D Printing.
Article in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Formulation and Characterization of Edible Bigel Inks for Structuring Fat Alternatives in 3D-Printed Foods.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to prepare ultrasonically modified peanut protein-guar gum composite emulsion gels for 3D printing. The composition of the composite emulsion gels was determined in single-factor and orthogonal experiments. The results revealed that the optimal composite emulsion gels consisted of 6% peanut protein, 50% oil and 0.2% guar gum. After crushing pretreatment for 45 s, the printing deviation of the composite emulsion gels was reduced to 8.58 ± 0.20%. Moreover, after ultrasonic treatment (200 W for 20 min) of peanut proteins, the obtained composite emulsion gels presented the highest yield stress, hardness and G' values, as well as a denser and more homogeneous microstructure. After protein ultrasonic modification (200 W or 600 W for 20 min), the printing accuracy and self-supporting properties of the composite emulsion gels for printing complex shapes significantly improved, which was attributed to their stronger textural and rheological properties; however, ultrasonically modified peanut protein-guar gum composite emulsion gels were not suitable for printing products with smooth surfaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.