ReviewDentistry journal2024
Outcomes of Flapless Er:YAG and Er,Cr:YSGG Laser-Assisted Crown Lengthening: A Systematic Review.
Review in Dentistry journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of Er:YAG laser in removal of impacted mandibular third molars (a randomized controlled clinical trial).BMC oral health · 2026Trial
- Crown Lengthening Procedures: Biological Foundations, Clinical Outcomes, and Contemporary Approaches in Flapless and Flap Techniques-A Narrative Review.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- The Richmond Crown Returns: A Laser-Assisted Approach to Restoring a Grossly Fractured Maxillary Central Incisor.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- Open-Flap and Flapless Er, Cr:YSGG Laser-Assisted Esthetic Crown Lengthening: A Comparative Study of Patient Perceptions.International journal of dentistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn recent years, erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) and erbium, chromium/yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) lasers have been introduced as another possibility to perform less-invasive flapless (FL) crown-lengthening (CL) procedures.
objectivesThe aim of this review is to describe the outcomes and complications of this approach. MATERIALS AND
methodsA literature review was conducted to retrieve clinical studies and case reports that analyze different variables related to laser-assisted flapless crown lengthening and report their outcomes in terms of gingival margin level stability (GMLS), and postoperative complications.
resultsA total of five studies were included in the final qualitative analysis; two of them were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the rest were case reports. The common variable measured in all studies was the GMLS, finding good stability in the FL groups at 3 months follow-up, but more tissue rebound was observed in patients with the thick biotype. Other variables were reported in different articles as the plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), bone margin level, biotype, bleeding on probing (BP), probing depth (PD), and postoperative pain by the numeric rating scale (NRS). DISCUSSION: There are a wide range of heterogenous clinical variables used to evaluate outcomes, as well as variations in the type of laser used and its parameters in terms of the applied technique. However, most analyzed studies showed better GMLS for the flapless technique, as well as less postoperative inflammation.
conclusionsThe included studies showed promising clinical outcomes in the FL laser-assisted CL groups concerning GMLS at the 3-month postoperative period. However, more RCTs are needed with respect to fixed laser parameters and patient biotype selection to reach a definitive clinical protocol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.