ArticleDentistry journal2024
Effectiveness of Lidocaine with Epinephrine Irrigation in Reducing Acute Pain from Surgical Removal of Mesioangular-Impacted Third Molars.
Article in Dentistry journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnesthetic irrigation is an effective treatment for postoperative pain suppression in patients after molar extraction, but exerts a short period of extraction. The study aimed to evaluate the effect of lidocaine with epinephrine irrigation on acute pain relief in healthy volunteers with inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) injection for the surgical removal of mesioangular (MA)-impacted third molars.
methodsA total of 28 patients (56 samples) with bilateral MA-impacted third molars were recruited. This study was a split-mouth, double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Surgical procedures were conducted over two separate appointments. Each patient randomly received 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine for the irrigation of the extraction site after surgery on one side of the mouth and normal saline solution on the other side. The postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) as a pain indicator was recorded and statistically analyzed for both treatments.
resultsThe VAS levels at 3 and 4 h after surgery in the lidocaine group were significantly lower than those of the normal saline group. Increases in pain scores were recorded five hours after surgery in both groups. No complications were recorded during this study.
conclusionsContinuous local anesthetic irrigation appears to be effective in reducing acute postoperative pain in patients with IANB for MA-impacted third molar surgery. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: Reference number ISRCTN13866362, Date: 1 October 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.