Article in Dentistry journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Diana SologovaDepartment of Oral Surgery of the Institute of Dentistry, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119048 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6376-7802
Ekaterina DiachkovaDepartment of Oral Surgery of the Institute of Dentistry, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119048 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4388-8911
Susanna SologovaDepartment of Pharmacology, Nelyubin Institute of Pharmacy, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8526-7147
Elena SmolyarchukDepartment of Pharmacology, Nelyubin Institute of Pharmacy, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Arus MargaryanDepartment of Pharmacology, Nelyubin Institute of Pharmacy, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Ekaterina GrigorevskikhDepartment of Pharmacology, Nelyubin Institute of Pharmacy, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Pavel PetrukMaxillofacial Surgery Department, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Elizaveta TumanovaDepartment of Oral Surgery of the Institute of Dentistry, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119048 Moscow, Russia.
Oxana SvitichDepartment of Microbiology, Virology, and Immunology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 125009 Moscow, Russia.
Svetlana TarasenkoDepartment of Oral Surgery of the Institute of Dentistry, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119048 Moscow, Russia.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Er:YAG laserextractionimpacted third molarlaser bone cutting
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
The Efficacy of Er:YAG Laser in the Extraction of Impacted Third Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial. · full record | OpenQuestion