Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39727362›Full record

ArticleAutophagy2025

Reconsidering the selectivity of bulk autophagy: cargo hitchhiking specifies cargo for degradation.

Eigo Takeda, Alexander I May, Yoshinori Ohsumi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Autophagy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. NADCells · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eigo TakedaInstitute for Genetic Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID 0009-0002-3143-6109
Alexander I MayCell Biology Center, Institute of Innovative Research, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Japan.
Yoshinori OhsumiCell Biology Center, Institute of Innovative Research, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bulk macroautophagy/autophagy, typically induced by starvation, is generally thought to isolate cytosolic components for degradation in a non-selective manner. Despite the fundamental nature of the eukaryotic degradation pathway, the question of what cargo is isolated by autophagy has remained unaddressed for over 30 years. We recently employed mass spectrometry to analyze the contents of isolated autophagic bodies. In the process of these experiments, we uncovered Hab1 (Highly enriched in Autophagic Bodies 1), a novel protein that is delivered extremely preferentially via autophagy. We report that Hab1 is a novel receptor protein, the N-terminus of which binds Atg8-PE, whereas the C-terminus binds ribosomes. Surprisingly, detailed biochemical and microscopic analyses revealed that ribosome-bound Hab1 is preferentially delivered to the vacuole by "'hitchhiking'" on phagophores/isolation membranes that form during bulk autophagy. This is a completely different mechanism of cargo selection that differs from previous descriptions of selective autophagy, in which the cargo-specific receptor proteins initiate phagophore membrane formation via scaffold proteins such as Atg11. We propose that cargo hitchhiking allows for the specification of cargo during bulk autophagy, which is otherwise a non-selective process.

Indexed as

AutophagyProteolysisSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsAutophagy-Related ProteinsRibosomesVacuolesAutophagy-Related ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsAtg8Hab1hitchhikingribosomeSaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID39727362
PMCPMC11925106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.