Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39727321›Full record

ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2024

Factors Affecting Usability and Acceptability of an Online Platform Used by Caregivers in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services: Mixed Methods Study.

Jessica Radley, Jessica Penhallow, Alice Wickersham, Anna Morris, Craig Colling, Johnny Downs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jessica RadleyInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, United Kingdom, 44 7858681876.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1111-5711
Jessica PenhallowCAMHS Digital Lab,Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4951-7874
Alice WickershamCAMHS Digital Lab,Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7402-7690
Anna MorrisCAMHS Digital Lab,Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8691-9653
Craig CollingCAMHS Digital Lab,Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5178-0383
Johnny DownsCAMHS Digital Lab,Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8061-295X

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/W002493/1Medical Research Council MR/Y030788/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Young people and families endure protracted waits for specialist mental health support in the United Kingdom. Staff shortages and limited resources have led many organizations to develop digital platforms to improve access to support. myHealthE is a digital platform used by families referred to Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services in South London. It was initially designed to improve the collection of routine outcome measures and subsequently the "virtual waiting room" module was added, which includes information about child and adolescent mental health as well as signposting to supportive services. However, little is known about the acceptability or use of digital resources, such as myHealthE, or about sociodemographic inequalities affecting access to these resources. Objective: This study aimed to assess the usability and acceptability of myHealthE as well as investigating whether any digital divides existed among its userbase in terms of sociodemographic characteristics. Methods: A survey was sent to all myHealthE users (N=7337) in May 2023. Caregivers were asked about their usage of myHealthE, their levels of comfort with technology and the internet. They completed the System Usability Scale and gave open-ended feedback on their experiences of using myHealthE. Results: A total of 680 caregivers responded, of whom 45% (n=306) were from a Black, Asian, or a minority ethnic background. Most (n=666, 98%) used a mobile phone to access myHealthE, and many had not accessed the platform's full functionality, including the new "virtual waiting room" module. Household income was a significant predictor of caregivers' levels of comfort using technology; caregivers were 13% more likely to be comfortable using technology with each increasing income bracket (adjusted odds ratio 1.13, 95% CI 1.00-1.29). Themes generated from caregivers' feedback highlight strengths of digital innovation as well as ideas for improvement, such as making digital platforms more personalized and tailored toward an individual's needs. Conclusions: Technology can bring many benefits to health care; however, sole reliance on technology may result in many individuals being excluded. To enhance engagement, clinical services must ensure that digital platforms are mobile friendly, personalized, that users are alerted and directed to their full functionality, and that efforts are made to bridge digital divides. Enhancing dissemination practices and improving accessibility to informative resources on the internet is critical to provide fair access to all using Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services.

Indexed as

acceptabilityadolescentcaregiverschild mental healthchildrendigital dividesdigital healthdigital literacydigital skilldigital technologyfamily careinformal caremental healthmobile phoneonline surveyonline systemspediatricplatformquestionnairesurveySUSSystem Usability Scaletechnology useusabilityyouth

Identifiers

PMID39727321
PMCPMC11694151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.