Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39727218›Full record

SynthesisWound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society

Indications for the use of dermal substitutes in patients with acute burns and in reconstructive surgery after burns: A systematic review.

Anna S van den Bosch, Robin A F Verwilligen, Anouk Pijpe, Lex B Jansen, Cornelis H van der Vlies, Merit E van Eck, George L Burchell, Paul P M van Zuijlen, Esther Middelkoop, National Burn Care, Education & Research Group, The Netherlands

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Indications for the use of dermal substitutes in patients with acute burns and in reconstructive surgery after burns: A systematic review.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anna S van den BoschAlliance of Dutch Burn Care (ADBC), Burn Centre, Red Cross Hospital, Beverwijk, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0003-0471-537X
Robin A F VerwilligenAlliance of Dutch Burn Care (ADBC), Burn Centre, Red Cross Hospital, Beverwijk, The Netherlands.
Anouk PijpeAlliance of Dutch Burn Care (ADBC), Burn Centre, Red Cross Hospital, Beverwijk, The Netherlands.
Lex B JansenAlliance of Dutch Burn Care (ADBC), Burn Centre, Red Cross Hospital, Beverwijk, The Netherlands.
Cornelis H van der VliesAlliance of Dutch Burn Care (ADBC), Burn Centre, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Merit E van EckAlliance of Dutch Burn Care (ADBC), Burn Centre, Martini Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands.
George L BurchellMedical Library, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Paul P M van ZuijlenAlliance of Dutch Burn Care (ADBC), Burn Centre, Red Cross Hospital, Beverwijk, The Netherlands.
Esther MiddelkoopAlliance of Dutch Burn Care (ADBC), Burn Centre, Red Cross Hospital, Beverwijk, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8843-1080
National Burn Care, Education & Research Group, The Netherlands

Funding

ZonMw 10070022010003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep dermal and full-thickness burns often result in scar sequelae such as contractures, hypertrophy, pain and itching following split-thickness skin grafting. Dermal substitutes are currently employed alongside split-thickness skin grafting to enhance clinical outcomes, though their indications remain a subject of ongoing debate. This systematic review aims to clarify the indications for the application of dermal substitutes in burn patients, in both acute and reconstructive settings. A comprehensive search across various databases was conducted. Studies (n = 190) assessing the indications and outcomes of dermal substitutes in acute burn patients and those requiring reconstructive surgery were included. Data extraction included the applied dermal substitute, age, total body surface area, wound depth, burn aetiology, anatomical site and exclusion criteria. The indications were derived from predetermined indications, i.e. inclusion and exclusion criteria and patient characteristics. The depth of the wound emerged as the primary indication for dermal substitute use. A one-stage approach is recommended for deep dermal to full-thickness wounds larger than 10 cm

Indexed as

BurnsPlastic Surgery ProceduresSkin, ArtificialSkin TransplantationWound HealingAcute DiseaseCicatrixHumansburn reconstructionburnsdermal substitutesindicationssystematic reviewtissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID39727218
PMCPMC11672668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.