Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39727201›Full record

Observational studyThe Australasian journal of dermatology2025

Dermoscopy of Scabies: Utility of Polarised and Ultraviolet-Induced Fluorescence Examination in Fair and Dark Skin.

Enzo Errichetti, Noemi Plozner, Nkechi A Enechukwu, Yasmeen J Bhat, Paweł Pietkiewicz, Natalia Salwowska, Iris Zalaudek, Giuseppe Stinco

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Australasian journal of dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Enzo ErrichettiDepartment of Medical Area, Institute of Dermatology, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7152-6136
Noemi PloznerDepartment of Medical Area, Institute of Dermatology, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Nkechi A EnechukwuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Nnamdi Azikiwe University/Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi, Nigeria.
Yasmeen J BhatDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, Government Medical College, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Paweł PietkiewiczIndependent Researcher, Poznań, Poland.
Natalia SalwowskaDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Iris ZalaudekDepartment of Dermatology, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Giuseppe StincoDepartment of Medical Area, Institute of Dermatology, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUltraviolet-based dermoscopy may support the recognition of scabies, yet neither accuracy analyses nor data on skin of colour are available. The aim of this multicentric observational retrospective was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of polarised and ultraviolet-induced fluorescence (UVF) dermoscopic examination in both fair and dark skin, also assessing possible differences according to the skin tone.

methodsConsecutive patients with a diagnosis of scabies were eligible. All the images were randomly evaluated by two independent experienced investigators to identify scabietic findings reported in the literature. Interobserver agreement was evaluated for both polarised and UVF dermoscopic pictures through Cohen's kappa coefficient, while Fisher's exact test with p-value set at 0.05 was used for comparative analyses between the two settings.

resultsA total of 97 lesions from 43 patients (21 with fair skin and 22 with dark skin) were included. The comparative analysis highlighted a superiority of UVF dermoscopy to detect the burrow (p = 0.003) and scabietic eggs (p = 0.012) in skin of colour, while polarised dermoscopy was more accurate to show the mite in fair skin (p = 0.042). Additionally, a general higher accuracy of both settings in light phototypes was also found, with a higher prevalence (p < 0.05) of typical scabietic findings (i.e., serpiginous white tract, 'triangle' sign and grey-brown outlines of the burrow for polarised dermoscopy and green dot for UVF dermoscopy) compared to dark skin. Kappa values were 0.87 and 0.83 for polarised and UVF-dermoscopy, respectively.

conclusionsUVF dermoscopy improves the recognition of scabies, though it should be considered complimentary to polarised light dermoscopic examination to increase diagnostic performance.

Indexed as

DermoscopyScabiesSkin PigmentationAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleFluorescenceHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUltraviolet RaysYoung Adultdiagnosisdifferential diagnosisscabiesskin of colourUV

Identifiers

PMID39727201
PMCPMC11898137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.