ArticleArchives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists2025
Validation of the Arabic Version of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29): a Rasch Analysis Study.
Article in Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Communication Difficulties and Associations With Health Literacy, Medication Beliefs, and Adherence in Multiple Sclerosis.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the CALMS Questionnaire in an Arabic-Speaking MS Population.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMultiple sclerosis (MS) is a potentially disabling disease of the brain and spinal cord. This cross-sectional study aimed to validate the Arabic version of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 (MSIS-29) using Rasch analysis to assess quality of life in Jordanian MS patients.
methodRasch analysis was conducted to evaluate the suitability of the model for the present study. Model fit was assessed by computing item/person separation reliability, infit and outfit mean square (MSQ) values, Cronbach's alpha, and the Akaike Information Criterion.
resultsA total of 301 MS patients were enrolled in the study. Significant likelihood ratios for all three scales (MSIS-29-PHYSICAL, MSIS-29-PSYCHOLOGICAL, and MSIS-29-TOTAL) supported the use of a partial credit Rasch model. An issue with disordered thresholds was resolved by collapsing adjacent response categories. Item reliability scores for MSIS-29-PHYS and MSIS-29-PSYCH were 0.95 and 0.89, respectively, while person reliability scores were 0.92 and 0.84, respectively. Infit and outfit MSQ were within the acceptable range for all items on the MSIS-29-PSYCH scale. However, for the MSIS-29-PHYS scale, item MSIS-29_17 exceeded the acceptable range in both infit (1.93) and outfit (1.82) MSQs, and item MSIS-29_20 exceeded the acceptable range in infit (1.81). The Wright map also indicated that most items were considered relatively easy by the respondents, exhibiting various difficulty levels on the latent scale.
conclusionThe Arabic version of the MSIS-29 is a valid and reliable tool for evaluating quality of life in Jordanian MS patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.