ArticleNucleic acids research2025
DNA polymerase zeta can efficiently replicate structures formed by AT/TA repeat sequences and prevent their deletion.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- TASP1-mediated cleavage of REV3L enhances the activity of DNA polymerase ζ in mammalian cells.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Cruciform-forming AT/TA repeats are acted upon by structure-selective endonucleases and Rad51 prior to repositioning to the nuclear periphery for repair.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- How DNA secondary structures drive replication fork instability.DNA repair · 2025Review
- Overcoming natural replication barriers formed by DNA structures and the role of repositioning to the nuclear periphery.DNA repair · 2025Review
- Replicative DNA polymerase epsilon and delta holoenzymes show wide-ranging inhibition at G-quadruplexes in the human genome.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Long AT repeat tracts form non-B DNA structures that stall DNA replication and cause chromosomal breakage. AT repeats are abundant in human common fragile sites (CFSs), genomic regions that undergo breakage under replication stress. Using an in vivo yeast model system containing AT-rich repetitive elements from human CFS FRA16D, we find that DNA polymerase zeta (Pol ζ) is required to prevent breakage and subsequent deletions at hairpin and cruciform forming (AT/TA)n sequences, with little to no role at an (A/T)28 repeat or a control non-structure forming sequence. DNA polymerase eta is not protective for deletions at AT-rich structures, while DNA polymerase delta is protective, but not in a repeat-specific manner. Using purified replicative holoenzymes in vitro, we show that hairpin structures are most inhibitory to yeast DNA polymerase epsilon, whereas yeast and human Pol ζ efficiently synthesize these regions in a stepwise manner. A requirement for the Rev1 protein and the modifiable lysine 164 of proliferating cell nuclear antigen to prevent deletions at AT/TA repeats suggests a mechanism for Pol ζ recruitment. Our results reveal a novel role for Pol ζ in replicating through AT-rich hairpins and suggest a role for Pol ζ in rescue of stalled replication forks caused by DNA structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.