Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39727020›Full record

Observational studyJMIR formative research2024

Screening for Depression and Anxiety Using a Nonverbal Working Memory Task in a Sample of Older Brazilians: Observational Study of Preliminary Artificial Intelligence Model Transferability.

Alexandra Livia Georgescu, Nicholas Cummins, Emilia Molimpakis, Eduardo Giacomazzi, Joana Rodrigues Marczyk, Stefano Goria

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JMIR formative research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexandra Livia Georgescuthymia, International House, 64 Nile Street, London, N1 7SR, United Kingdom, 44 7477285252.ORCID 0000-0003-1929-5673
Nicholas Cumminsthymia, International House, 64 Nile Street, London, N1 7SR, United Kingdom, 44 7477285252.ORCID 0000-0002-1178-917X
Emilia Molimpakisthymia, International House, 64 Nile Street, London, N1 7SR, United Kingdom, 44 7477285252.ORCID 0000-0003-2096-3122
Eduardo GiacomazziGrupo Laços Saúde, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0009-8228-9226
Joana Rodrigues MarczykGrupo Laços Saúde, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9393-8775
Stefano Goriathymia, International House, 64 Nile Street, London, N1 7SR, United Kingdom, 44 7477285252.ORCID 0009-0007-9882-0419

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Anxiety and depression represent prevalent yet frequently undetected mental health concerns within the older population. The challenge of identifying these conditions presents an opportunity for artificial intelligence (AI)-driven, remotely available, tools capable of screening and monitoring mental health. A critical criterion for such tools is their cultural adaptability to ensure effectiveness across diverse populations. Objective: This study aims to illustrate the preliminary transferability of two established AI models designed to detect high depression and anxiety symptom scores. The models were initially trained on data from a nonverbal working memory game (1- and 2-back tasks) in a dataset by thymia, a company that develops AI solutions for mental health and well-being assessments, encompassing over 6000 participants from the United Kingdom, United States, Mexico, Spain, and Indonesia. We seek to validate the models' performance by applying it to a new dataset comprising older Brazilian adults, thereby exploring its transferability and generalizability across different demographics and cultures. Methods: A total of 69 Brazilian participants aged 51-92 years old were recruited with the help of Laços Saúde, a company specializing in nurse-led, holistic home care. Participants received a link to the thymia dashboard every Monday and Thursday for 6 months. The dashboard had a set of activities assigned to them that would take 10-15 minutes to complete, which included a 5-minute game with two levels of the n-back tasks. Two Random Forest models trained on thymia data to classify depression and anxiety based on thresholds defined by scores of the Patient Health Questionnaire (8 items) (PHQ-8) ≥10 and those of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Assessment (7 items) (GAD-7) ≥10, respectively, were subsequently tested on the Laços Saúde patient cohort. Results: The depression classification model exhibited robust performance, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.78, a specificity of 0.69, and a sensitivity of 0.72. The anxiety classification model showed an initial AUC of 0.63, with a specificity of 0.58 and a sensitivity of 0.64. This performance surpassed a benchmark model using only age and gender, which had AUCs of 0.47 for PHQ-8 and 0.53 for GAD-7. After recomputing the AUC scores on a cross-sectional subset of the data (the first n-back game session), we found AUCs of 0.79 for PHQ-8 and 0.76 for GAD-7. Conclusions: This study successfully demonstrates the preliminary transferability of two AI models trained on a nonverbal working memory task, one for depression and the other for anxiety classification, to a novel sample of older Brazilian adults. Future research could seek to replicate these findings in larger samples and other cultural contexts.

Indexed as

AnxietyArtificial IntelligenceDepressionMemory, Short-TermAgedAged, 80 and overBrazilFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedSouth American PeopleAIanxietyartificial intelligenceBrazildepressiondetectiongerontologylongitudinal studymachine learningmental healthn-backolder adultsquestionnairescreeningtransferabilityworking memory

Identifiers

PMID39727020
PMCPMC11657908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.