ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2024
Revised taxonomic classification of the
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- NIR-Assisted Multimodal Strategies for Enhanced Antibacterial Therapy.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
- Article
- Highly effective isolation ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Global Comparative Genomics ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Genomic phylogeny, taxonomic classification, genetic landscape, and antibiotic resistance of clinicalFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial resistance mechanisms, treatment challenges, and emerging strategies inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Integrated genomic analysis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Phylogenetic divergence drives distinct antimicrobial susceptibility profiles and resistomes inFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Diversity Among Clinical and Fresh Produce Isolates ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Phylogenetic and motif-based genomic analysis of Mokola virus: implications for regional divergence and data gaps.BMC genomic data · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Methods: All 2,615 genomes of the genus Results: Compared to the reference genomes of each species, 41.17% of the submitted Conclusion: The results confirmed that 16S rRNA gene sequencing has low discriminability for the closely related
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.