Observational studyPediatric diabetes2024
The Reproducibility and Reliability of Insulin Sensitivity and Secretion Indices in Children and Adolescents.
Observational study in Pediatric diabetes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nomogram incorporating TyG index and TG/HDL ratio for early prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Indicators of Glucose Metabolism in Children and Adolescents Characterized as Having "Metabolically Healthy" and "Metabolically Unhealthy" Obesity.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Context: Insulin sensitivity and secretion indices can be useful tools in understanding insulin homeostasis in children at risk for diabetes. There have been few studies examining the reproducibility of these measures in pediatrics. Objective: To determine whether fasting or oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)-derived insulin measures would be more reproducible and whether there would be differences based on weight, sex, race, and pubertal status. Design: Observational study. Setting: Clinical research unit. Patients or Other Participants: Two hundred fifty-seven overweight/obese (BMI ≥ 85th%, Methods: OGTT tests performed in study participants at two separate visits within a 3-week period. We performed two formal oral glucose tolerance tests within a 3-week period. The reproducibility of fasting measures was compared with OGTT-derived measures by weight categories and compared by weight, sex, race, and pubertal status. Comparisons were made between the correlation coefficients of fasting vs. OGTT-derived measures and between normal weight vs. obese/overweight participants, male vs. female, White vs. Black, and pre- vs. post-midpubertal. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated for each comparison as well. Results: For insulin sensitivity, the OGTT-derived measure was more reproducible than the fasting measures. There were no significant differences in reproducibility in the overweight/obese population compared to the normal weight population nor by sex, race, or pubertal status. Conclusions: Nonfasting insulin sensitivity measures are more reproducible than fasting insulin sensitivity measures, regardless of weight category. Insulin secretion measures have poor reproducibility overall. Weight status, sex, race, and midpubertal stage do not impact the reproducibility of insulin sensitivity and secretion measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.