ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
Predicting intra-abdominal candidiasis in elderly septic patients using machine learning based on lymphocyte subtyping: a prospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Intra-abdominal candidiasis (IAC) is difficult to predict in elderly septic patients with intra-abdominal infection (IAI). This study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram based on lymphocyte subtyping and clinical factors for the early and rapid prediction of IAC in elderly septic patients. Methods: A prospective cohort study of 284 consecutive elderly patients diagnosed with sepsis and IAI was performed. We assessed the clinical characteristics and parameters of lymphocyte subtyping at the onset of IAI. A machine-learning random forest model was used to select important variables, and multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the factors influencing IAC. A nomogram model was constructed, and the discrimination, calibration, and clinical effectiveness of the model were verified. Results: According to the results of the random forest and multivariate analyses, gastrointestinal perforation, renal replacement therapy (RRT), T-cell count, CD28+CD8+ T-cell count and CD38+CD8+ T-cell count were independent predictors of IAC. Using the above parameters to establish a nomogram, the area under the curve (AUC) values of the nomogram in the training and testing cohorts were 0.840 (95% CI 0.778-0.902) and 0.783 (95% CI 0.682-0.883), respectively. The AUC in the training cohort was greater than the Conclusion: We established a nomogram based on the T-cell count, CD28+CD8+ T-cell count, CD38+CD8+ T-cell count and clinical risk factors that can help clinical physicians quickly rule out IAC or identify elderly patients at greater risk for IAC at the onset of infection. Clinical Trial Registration: [chictr.org.cn], identifier [ChiCTR2300069020].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.