ReviewPeerJ2024
Evaluating techniques for determining elasmobranch body size: a review of current methodologies.
Review in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Insights Into the Ecomorphology of the Blue Shark (Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Monitoring juvenile sicklefin lemon shark Negaprion acutidens in remote marine nurseries using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is global awareness that many species of elasmobranchs (sharks and rays) have life history characteristics that make them susceptible to overexploitation. The study of these animals is critical, as it contributes to increasing knowledge of these specimens and aids in their conservation. In particular, growth rate, age, fecundity, and size at maturity are key parameters for defining management and conservation strategies in elasmobranchs. Biometric data collection allows these parameters to be determined and considered in the evaluation of population demography. Over the last decades, several methodologies for measuring elasmobranch size have evolved, progressing from traditional capture-based methods to sophisticated, non-intrusive photographic techniques. The present review aims to understand and analyse all the existing non-invasive techniques that currently allow the collection of zoometric data in elasmobranchs and, later, to highlight the advantages and limitations of each technique, with comments on their application to fieldwork. To this end, 49 articles were selected, encompassing seven measurement techniques: photogrammetry using distance to the individual, bar photogrammetry, laser photogrammetry, stereo-DOV, stereo-BRUV, stereo-ROV, and aerial photogrammetry. Globally, the last four techniques are excellent alternatives to methods that involve animal capture or death, as they are practical, simple to use, minimally invasive, and potentially highly accurate. Each technique's requirements related to equipment and cost, limitations, and distinctive features are presented here and summarized to guide researchers on what's available and how to select the most appropriate for their studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.