Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39726740›Full record

ReviewPeerJ2024

Evaluating techniques for determining elasmobranch body size: a review of current methodologies.

Ana S Ferreira, Márcia A Naré, Joana I Robalo, Núria D Baylina

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ana S FerreiraOceanário de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Márcia A NaréInstituto Universitário de Ciências Psicológicas, Sociais e da Vida (ISPA), Lisbon, Portugal.
Joana I RobaloMarine and Environmental Sciences Centre/ ARNET - Aquatic Research Network, Instituto Universitário de Ciências Psicológicas, Sociais e da Vida (ISPA), Lisbon, Portugal.
Núria D BaylinaOceanário de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is global awareness that many species of elasmobranchs (sharks and rays) have life history characteristics that make them susceptible to overexploitation. The study of these animals is critical, as it contributes to increasing knowledge of these specimens and aids in their conservation. In particular, growth rate, age, fecundity, and size at maturity are key parameters for defining management and conservation strategies in elasmobranchs. Biometric data collection allows these parameters to be determined and considered in the evaluation of population demography. Over the last decades, several methodologies for measuring elasmobranch size have evolved, progressing from traditional capture-based methods to sophisticated, non-intrusive photographic techniques. The present review aims to understand and analyse all the existing non-invasive techniques that currently allow the collection of zoometric data in elasmobranchs and, later, to highlight the advantages and limitations of each technique, with comments on their application to fieldwork. To this end, 49 articles were selected, encompassing seven measurement techniques: photogrammetry using distance to the individual, bar photogrammetry, laser photogrammetry, stereo-DOV, stereo-BRUV, stereo-ROV, and aerial photogrammetry. Globally, the last four techniques are excellent alternatives to methods that involve animal capture or death, as they are practical, simple to use, minimally invasive, and potentially highly accurate. Each technique's requirements related to equipment and cost, limitations, and distinctive features are presented here and summarized to guide researchers on what's available and how to select the most appropriate for their studies.

Indexed as

Body SizeElasmobranchiiAnimalsBiometryPhotogrammetryElasmobranchiiLength/size determinationNon-invasive techniquesPhotogrammetryStereo-video

Identifiers

PMID39726740
PMCPMC11670763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.