ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Descriptive analysis of durvalumab use in unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer in patients treated in Quebec's University teaching hospitals.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-World Survival Outcomes Following Chemoradiotherapy with or Without Durvalumab in PD-L1-Defined Subgroups of Stage III Unresectable NSCLC.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Real-world 5-year outcomes with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in unresectable stage III NSCLC.ESMO open · 2026Article
- Impact of duration of maintenance immunotherapy on the prognosis of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Consolidation durvalumab post chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) has been demonstrated to improve survival in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Real-world data to assess its use and impact on patients, particularly in Quebec, remain limited. Methods: We, therefore, aimed to assess real-world durvalumab use in inoperable stage III NSCLC in Quebec, to describe progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes as reported in the PACIFIC trial, and to evaluate safety and toxicity. Patients were retrospectively reviewed between January 1rst 2019 and December 31st 2020, based on their oncology reference date. Results: One hundred and eight patients treated with CRT were included, among which 82 received durvalumab (75.9%). The mean duration of treatment was 48 weeks [4-52], and 55% of patients completed the full treatment. Median PFS was 40 months in patients treated with CRT + durvalumab vs 6.9 months with CRT alone, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.22 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.13-0.37; p < 0.0001). Limited access to CT scanning during the COVID pandemic, might have led to delayed disease progression detection and thus prolonged PFS. Median OS was > 52.8 months with CRT + durvalumab vs 19 months with CRT alone (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.18-0.60; p=0.0002). Discussion: These findings support the efficacy and safety profile of durvalumab in real-world settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.