ArticleRoyal Society open science2024
Amplitude modulation structure in French and German poetry: universal acoustic physical structures underpin different poetic rhythm structures.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rhythm Processing Across Development: Origins, Links to Language Processing, and Perspectives for Intervention.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026Review
- The Amplitude Modulation Structure of Japanese Infant- and Child-Directed Speech: Longitudinal Data Reveal Universal Acoustic Physical Structures That Accommodate Both Syllabic and Moraic Timing.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- Temporal dynamics of uncertainty and prediction error in musical improvisation across different periods.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Amplitude modulation structure in French and German poetry: universal acoustic physical structures underpin different poetic rhythm structures.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
French and German poetry are classically considered to utilize fundamentally different linguistic structures to create rhythmic regularity. Their metrical rhythm structures are considered poetically to be very different. However, the biophysical and neurophysiological constraints upon the speakers of these poems are highly similar. Scientifically, this suggests that at the level of the acoustic physical structures that are produced orally, the two poetic genres may be rhythmically extremely similar. Here, we apply a language-blind computational model of linguistic rhythm based on features of the amplitude envelope (AE) to compute these physical stimulus characteristics. The model was applied to recordings of the recitation of metrical French and German poems by native speakers. Poems in free verse were not considered in the study. The results indicated that the acoustic physical structures of the poems were identical for the two languages in terms of temporal modulation patterns in the AE. This challenges the linguistic view that German poetry utilizes lexical stress to create prosodic alternation between strong and weak syllables, while French poetry relies on accentuation at the level of prosodic phrasing. Nevertheless, minor differences in physical structure could be detected by applying further modelling drawn, respectively, from the birdsong and neural connectivity literatures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.