Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39726692›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2024

Beyond awareness: the binding of reflexive mechanisms with the conscious mind: a perspective from default space theory.

Ravinder Jerath, Connor Beveridge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ravinder JerathCharitable Medical Healthcare Foundation, Augusta, GA, United States.
Connor BeveridgeCharitable Medical Healthcare Foundation, Augusta, GA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How do reflexes operate so quickly with so much multimodal information on the environment? How might unconscious processes help reveal the nature of consciousness? The Default Space Theory of Consciousness (DST) offers a novel way to interpret these questions by describing how sensory inputs, cognitive functions, emotional states, and unconscious processes are integrated by a single unified internal representation. Recent developments in neuroimaging and electrophysiology, such as fMRI, EEG, and MEG, have improved our knowledge of the brain mechanisms that underpin the conscious mind and have highlighted the importance of neural oscillations and sensory integration in its formation. In this article, we put forth a perspective on an underresearched relationship of reflexes with the dynamic character of consciousness and suggest that future research should focus on the interplay of the unconscious processes of reflexes and correlates of the contents of consciousness to better understand its nature. Existing research on the top-down cortical influence over the subcortical operations of reflexes is severely lacking. This top-down influence has been demonstrated, but how the complex multimodal model of the self and environment is encoded and utilized to produce quick and coordinated reflex responses is not understood. Integrating unconscious/subconscious reflexive mechanisms with models of consciousness may illuminate a boundary between or gradient among conscious and unconscious activity. This perspective in light of the DST's framework may reveal future research avenues aimed at understanding the complexities and physical nature of consciousness.

Indexed as

consciousnessdefault spacemultisensory integrationphenomenologyreflexestop-down modulation

Identifiers

PMID39726692
PMCPMC11670070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.