ArticleEnergy & environmental science2025
Probing ionic conductivity and electric field screening in perovskite solar cells: a novel exploration through ion drift currents.
Article in Energy & environmental science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Quantification of Mobile Ions in Perovskite Solar Cells with Thermally Activated Ion Current Measurements.ACS energy letters · 2026Article
- 'Ion-freeze' efficiency in perovskite solar cells: time scales for ion immobilization.EES solar · 2025Article
- Dynamic Screening and the Chemical Inductor of Perovskite Solar Cells: FromThe journal of physical chemistry letters · 2025Article
- Ionic Losses and Gains in Perovskite Solar Cells: Impact on Efficiency and Stability.ACS energy letters · 2025Article
- Determining the Ion Mobility in Perovskite Solar Cells from Impedance Spectroscopy.ACS energy letters · 2025Article
- Challenges and opportunities for the characterization of electronic properties in halide perovskite solar cells.Chemical science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is widely accepted that mobile ions are responsible for the slow electronic responses observed in metal halide perovskite-based optoelectronic devices, and strongly influence long-term operational stability. Electrical characterisation methods mostly observe complex indirect effects of ions on bulk/interface recombination, struggle to quantify the ion density and mobility, and are typically not able to fully quantify the influence of the ions upon the bulk and interfacial electric fields. We analyse the bias-assisted charge extraction (BACE) method for the case of a screened bulk electric field, and introduce a new characterisation method based on BACE, termed ion drift BACE. We reveal that the initial current density and current decay dynamics depend on the ion conductivity, which is the product of ion density and mobility. This means that for an unknown high ion density, typical in perovskite solar absorber layers, the mobility cannot be directly obtained from BACE measurements. We derive an analytical model to illustrate the relation between current density, conductivity and bulk field screening, supported by drift-diffusion simulations. By measuring the ion density independently with impedance spectroscopy, we show how the ion mobility can be derived from the BACE ion conductivity. We highlight important differences between the low- and high-ion density cases, which reveal whether the bulk electric field is fully screened or not. Our work clarifies the complex ion-related processes occurring within perovskite solar cells and gives new insight into the operational principles of halide perovskite devices as mixed ionic-electronic conductors.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.